I hike, I blog

tom's hiking face

Now blogging from North Carolina's Triad (Greensboro/Winston-Salem/Highpoint) and hiking the trails as I find them.

All New: Map page for my North Carolina hikes

Most of the content here reflects five years worth of hikes in the San Francisco Bay Area. I've created a Guide to Bay Area Hikes for those who are looking for nice dirt paths to trod in Northern California.

Need more background? Get the facts on Two-Heel Drive.

Archive for the ‘Backpacking light’ Category

Nice lightweight-backing blog: Brett on Stuff

Thursday, July 3rd, 2008

Brett does most of his hiking in the Pacific Northwest but he has been known to haunt the higher elevations of California. Check out the post count on each of these categories at his blog:

So, yeah, he’s been at it awhile. He also has a bunch of trip reports and general outdoor musings. Worth a place on your RSS feed list.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Christmas gifts for light-weight backpackers

Friday, December 7th, 2007

LightBackpacking.com has a bunch of suggestions. Interesting ditty: A Nikon monocular/spotting scope. I have one made by Zeiss that I use occasionally — it’s small, light & handy but hard to hold still enough to get much use out of.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Andrew Skurka has only one annoying trait I know of

Tuesday, December 4th, 2007

He never says anything to provoke cutting remarks from the snark-o-sphere (must drive the poor kids at GoBlog batty). Here’s another interview with him in his hometown paper, the Boulder Daily Camera. Earnest, honest, straightforward, and even though I’ve never met the guy, I’m tempted to say: probably somebody you’d want to hike with (if you could keep up with his 30-mile-a-day pace). What’s next for National Geographic’s Adventurer of the Year?

I don’t have any specific plans right now, and I say right now because I’m sure I will. I have been looking over some maps and trying to plan some things. This summer I could definitely see myself going to Alaska. I would love to go to Scotland for two weeks. For the most part I’m done with mega trips in the lower 48. I’ve seen most of what I want to see, but there are certainly places I want to get back to, like the Wind River Range, the Cascades and the Weminuche (Wilderness Area).

There’s a video at the bottom of the interview. More NatGeo honorees here.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Dan on bivy camping

Friday, September 14th, 2007

Dan Mitchell describes a couple days in the Sierra in which he was obliged to ride out a rain shower in the close confines of a bivy sack. He also had to figure out how one inserts one’s wet body into a dry sack, to wit:

A couple minutes later it was raining enough that I had to stop and put a rain cover on my camera bag. As I dropped through a steeper section of the route between the middle and upper lake I realized that I was starting to get significantly wet. I found a partially fallen tree that provided shelter until the rain slacked off a bit, and then continued on for another 15-20 minutes in the drizzle to reach my campsite.


Fortunately, I had zipped my bivy up tight, so my camp was secure and dry. Now I had the opportunity to figure out how to try to keep it that way while getting out of wet clothes and into the bivy. It went something like this: Take boots off and stuff them into a large plastic bag along with pack and few other odds and ends. Move food canister close to bivy in case rain continues during dinner. Open bivy and push sleeping bag away from the opening. Standing in the opening of the bivy, quickly put on additional poly layers and put the damp pants and shirt on over them. Zip into the bivy while lying on top of the sleeping bag and let body heat do its work of drying the damp clothes. Listen to thunder and rain and hail on the bivy. When rain stops, sit up in bivy and fix dinner — and then zip up again for after-dinner showers.

I used a bivy on the White Mountain outing and had something interesting happen: In the middle of the night I noticed a bunch of condensation on the inside, confined mainly to one side (hey, I need something to keep my mind occupied while I’m lying there pretending to sleep for nine hours.) Then I noticed my sleeping bag was half open on the same side and I realized the body heat escaping my bag was causing the condensation. After I zipped up, it seemed to dry up a bit.

Something else I learned on this outing: you need to know alternative tarp pitches before you’re standing on a broad saddle between hills with 30 mph winds gusting through. You really need to know your knots and pitches by heart or you’ll just be casting about in the wind driving yourself nuts.

(The more I experience camping with alternatives to tents, the better tents look).

Share/Save/Bookmark

Learning to be light: The outing

Monday, May 1st, 2006

Somewhere during a punishing climb at Henry Coe State Park over the weekend, I thought about bowling balls. Namely, how glad I was not to be carrying any.

I grew about a mile from a bowling alley, so I remember a lot about bowling balls: A standard-weight adult ball is 16 pounds. If you’ve held one in your hands, you know exactly what 16 pounds feels like. And now that you’ve got the mental image in your head, picture carrying a bowling ball through 10 miles of hills, forests and streams, camping out for a night and carrying it back to where you came from.

I know, madness. Why carry 16 pounds you’ll never need? Oddly enough, lots of people who are into backpacking are carrying a bowling ball’s worth of too-heavy or unnecessary gear. Why don’t they get rid of it? Well, it’s not like you can stick three fingers into your pack and pluck out sixteen pounds of excess weight. It takes a lot of thought, ingenuity and willingness to sacrifice certain comforts to gain certain rewards. You can learn this all on your own, or you can take a class, which is what I did early in April.

The best classroom for lightweight backpacking is the trail. With that in mind, Steve from the Sierra Club set up his shave-the-pounds class in two parts: a weekend in a classroom (check out my write-up), and a weekend in the outdoors, which was this past Saturday and Sunday.

To drive home the point of how much going light changes everything about backpacking, Steve chose Henry Coe, home of the most death-march trails within easy driving distance of San Jose. After a 20-plus-mile weekend on those hills, it’s clear to me that a 20-pound pack cannot ease the strain of hiking a gravel road straight up a hillside for a mile or so. I always go to Coe I thinking I’ve climbed the steepest hill in the park, till I hike someplace new and realize I was mistaken. So it was reassuring to tell myself: Thank God I left the bowling ball at home.

Seven guys from Steve’s class met at Henry Coe headquarters early Saturday. The first order of business is the weigh-in.

Bart’s got about 20 pounds in his overnight bag. Mine had 23, which seemed odd, because the last time I checked, I had 21, but I realized that at the last minute I had thrown in my bivy bag (10 ounces), park map, wallet, and car keys and lord knows what else. Instant extra two pounds. Alas. Our group’s packs ranged from high teens to the low thirties.

Steve, center, prepares us for his lesson plan. We’re only a couple miles down the trail and it’s been all downhill, so we’ve hardly worked up a sweat.

At Poverty Flat, Steve conducts a tarp hanging seminar. Lowell, left, prepares to stake out a corner.

Steve’s tarp doubles as a poncho. Not much room under there, and not much protection from bugs in the ground or in the air. But his shelter, stakes and ground cloth weigh about a pound, max, compared to four or five pounds for typical backpacking tent. In mild, non-buggy weather with no rain in the forecast, all you really need is something to keep the wind out of your face while you sleep.

Julio, right, and Lowell marching up one of Coe’s oh-so-fun hills. Julio lost 130 pounds by hiking, backpacking and getting his diet together.

Hiking through a stream on the way to one of the more remote corners of the park. Steve, right, has everything he needs in that little pack of his. One way to cut a lot of pack weight is to go with a frameless pack, which can weigh less than a pound. Packs with frames weigh more but tend to be a bit more comfortable. You wouldn’t want to carry much more than 20 pounds in a frameless pack.

These flowers have nothing to do with backpacking.

Hector had the heaviest pack at about 32 pounds, but he’s used to carrying upwards of 50 so he was still thankful for the advice on shaving excess weight.

Another stream crossing. Steve guided us to a remote corner of the park that was probably five miles from the nearest campers. A light load lets you walk a lot further, so you can get to places you’d never reach carrying conventional weight.

Another awesome dead tree.

Getting ready to stop for dinner, Steve ponders how many more miles we might get in before bedding down for the night. We emulate the style of long-distance hikers, who break for dinner and hike on for a few miles so the smell of their food doesn’t accompany them into their campsites.

Nice backdrop for a dinner break.

Poppies are popping out all over. Just give ‘em some sun and they go crazy.

Steve’s plan for an after-dinner hike: Straight up another astonishingly steep hill. The setting sun gave the hills an amazing glow.

We camped out on a grassy glade; this is my tarp, which was a big snug for my taste. But it weighs only half a pound. Fog filled the valley overnight and ensured everything was coated with dew, including my camera’s lens. I slept on a bumpy bit of earth but was able to contort myself into a reasonably comfortable position and get a decent night’s sleep. The ground was by no means flat, but it was soft, unlike you’re average hard-packed, developed campsite. This meant I could leave my full-length ThermaRest at home and use a light insulating pad that weighed a pound less.

Breakfast is about a half-mile down the trail, after we’ve broken camp. We pack up all our gear wet because we’re going to take a long lunch break and dry everything out during the warmest part of the day. Otherwise we’d just sit in camp for hours till the sun got high enough in the sky. May as well be hiking during the wait.

I’m not saying going light will guarantee you’ll see such fine scenery. But it’s something to aspire to. Thing is, with 40 or 50 pounds on your back, your hiking day is done after six or eight miles. With half the weight you can go twice as far, doubling your scenery intake.

Why is Fred smiling? Last stream crossing of the day! Little did he suspect the hellacious hill he was about to begin climbing. Fred stuffed all his gear into a day pack borrowed from his wife; he slept under a big sheet of plastic — not durable but very cheap. His camp stove was made from an aluminum soft-drink can. He told me he did buy some gear, but the fact that he didn’t have to buy a new pack, stove or shelter suggests you don’t need to go broke converting to a lightweight style.

Near the top of Middle Ridge. Henry Coe is lovely when it’s green. There are no easy ways to get here, but there are lighter ways.

Back at the headquarters, everybody has one more weigh-in.

The guys came home pretty much sold on the idea of shedding excess weight. We walked about 11 miles on Saturday and didn’t have that beaten-down feeling you get from hauling a lot of weight over a long distance. Sunday was mostly uphill back to Coe Headquarters and we slogged up some seriously steep trails that would’ve been downright treacherous if we’d have been carrying big loads. I huffed and cursed my way up them, relieved that if somebody was carrying bowling balls through Henry Coe State Park, at least it wasn’t me.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Learning to be light

Sunday, April 9th, 2006

No new pictures this week — I spent the whole weekend back in the classroom

One of the ways adulthood totally rules over childhood is that you can pick only the kind of class you’re interested in. If I had any professional, artistic or intellectual ambitions, I’d be up the road at Berkeley taking instruction from some of the finest minds on the Pacific Rim. Don’t fret, I’m having none of that: I parked my fanny in a class on lightweight backpacking taught by a former member of the Iowa Mountaineers (not kidding: it’s a club of flatlanders who travel to mountains to climb them).

The teacher is Steve, the guy who took me snow camping several weeks back. He belongs to a local Sierra Club chapter that conducts lessons every spring instructing people how to stay alive in the forests and mountains for days on end with nothing but the clothes on their back and a pack full of survival essentials strapped onto it.

The most memorable image: Eleven of us sit at tables in a small meeting room in a nondescript office park on the outskirts of Palo Alto. Steve faces us from behind a table containing a blue backpack that looks big enough for moon missions. Steve notes that he routinely toted 60-70 pounds in this leviathan before he saw the light and started trimming his load. While describing his idea of a "lightweight" pack, he opens a zipper and plucks a smaller pack — one that might hold 15 to 20 pounds of gear fully loaded — from the beast’s upper thorax.. Then he starts talking about his "ultralight" pack and snatches a shiny little number from the beast’s lower abdominal cavity.

Clever bit of stagecraft. Steve could take that act to Vegas; I hear there are great trails in the mountains outside of town.

For years, one of the primary appeals of backpacking has been the melding of dreadful suffering with wondrous outdoor vistas. Most folks are content to gawk at mountains and forests from their cars or camper vans, but those who insist on seeing them up close have been forced, until recently, to carry equipment built tough enough for Everest expeditions. A few people who were not Sherpas became indignant that lugging a 50-pound pack up a hillside turned an afternoon amid nature’s wonder into hours of praying for the day’s end or death, whichever came first. They made up their minds to enjoy the show and save their shoulders (and knees, hips, ankles and feet), and the lightweight-backpacking movement was born.

People who are fanatically weight-conscious enough can get their camping kit down to about five or six pounds, not counting food, water or cooking fuel. The point of Steve’s class is not to produce fanatics, but to show perfectly levelheaded outdoorspeople how to get their packs down to the 12-15 pound range.

A couple of my classmates have no choice: one is a woman in her 50s who is recovering from a terrible car crash that left her in a wheelchair for several years. She can walk, slowly, and now that she’s back on her feet, she’s determined to get back in the mountains while she still can. The guy sitting next to her figures he can keep hiking on his bad knee if he cuts enough pack weight. Next to me sits a guy in his early 70s who craves campouts but can’t let a backpack trip up the wires on his pacemaker. His plan: a fanny pack and a satchel slung over one shoulder.

Among hikers, the people who are into lightweight backpacking are considered at best eccentric, at worst crazy as bedbugs. This is odd, given that the very first thing you want to do after putting a heavy backpack on is take it right back off. It’s perfectly rational to wish one’s pack were not so heavy, and yet those who take this idea and run with it are the ones considered loco.

Steve draws a curve on the whiteboard explaining how each extra pound of weight takes a certain number of miles off your hike. The bigger the load, the more fuel needed to move it. And it works in reverse: the less you carry, the less you consume.

The trick is to reduce the three heaviest things in your pack: pack, shelter and sleeping gear. Steve shows how to get each component down to 2 pounds apiece. Trade the tent in for a tarp and a lightweight bug net. Use a down quilt instead of a sleeping bag. Get a frameless pack. Find multiple uses for gear: your rain poncho can also be your tarp. Get a scale and weigh everything; put it on a spreadsheet to see how fast it all adds up.

Gear’s only half the story though. The rest of it is about finding just the right campsite — on soft ground, out of the wind, sheltered from storms — and adapting your hiking style to account for all the extra miles you can cover without the backbreaking weight.

His lecture brings one "wow, I never thought of that" after another. Classmates are amazed to learn about a host of Web sites and backyard entrepreneurs who build highly specialized, super-lightweight gear, often by hand.

Steve’s mantra is that cutting weight always starts upstairs: Something in your head will never be as heavy as something on your back. Which, come to think of it, applies to just about everything.

Share/Save/Bookmark

On going light

Thursday, February 17th, 2005

Just got this e-mail this morning from a veteran hiker/backpacker named Scott Huffman. It was so interesting I’m compelled to share:

Tom,

I just saw your blog (via Susan Mernit). I noticed that there is no mention (yet) of “lite” backpacking gear.

I used to go hiking years ago when I lived in WV. I had a *huge* pack that I’d load with 50 lbs of gear for a weekend hike along the Greenbrier River trail.

Then I moved to Chicago. Not many places to go hiking there. However, while there I discovered a company called GoLite. Check out their web site, golite.com. I have no affiliation with the company, although I do like their stuff. They’ve got good service, too. They had a quality control problem with one of their first products. Even though I didn’t have a problem with the one I had, they sent me a free replacement and let me keep the original product — what a deal, two for one.

Anyway, when I first discovered them, they had only a few products and they were pretty much the only lightweight game in town. Now, there are many companies that have good lightweight hiking gear. I still use the original “Breeze” pack I bought from GoLite 5 years ago. It’s simple, but almost perfect for my needs — and it weighs only 11 oz.

Then, two years ago I moved to Europe. One of the reasons was to do some hiking in the Alps — that had always been a dream of mine. Last year, I managed to get in some hikes in Austria (Wilde Kaiser) and Italy (the Dolomites). This year, Switzerland is on the agenda.

I’m older now than when I carried the world on my back in WV (I’m your age, as a matter of fact), and there’s no way I could manage the kind of hiking I and my hiking buddies do if I didn’t go as “lite” as possible. I do week long hikes in the Alps, now, with less than 14 lbs of gear (including water).

A great place for info on “lite” backpaking is the Yahoo! Group BackpackingLight:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BackpackingLight/

Check it out. I think you’ll like it.

There are many web sites devoted to light backpacking, too. Here’s one of the first I ever found:

http://www.monmouth.com/~mconnick/

He calls it “ultra lightweight” backpacking, but I found many good ideas there and I would not consider myself an ultra lightweight backpacker (although, I do find now that I pay great attention to the weight of everything that goes into my pack).

After reading your site, maybe I’ll start blogging my Alpine hikes, too.

We’ll see.

Anyway, keep up the posts.

Regards,
Scott

Scott’s right, of course. I found out how right last week, the first time I piled all my new gear into my new pack and slogged up a mountain trail that went 2000 feet up in less than two miles. When I got back home, Melissa asked how it went. I had a one-word reply:

“Heavy.”

Before I bought all this new stuff I had read up on packing light … my sense was that “going light” was something veterans did only after they learned how to do it the right (that is, heavy) way. I’m a firm believer that you have to know the fundamentals before you harbor any fantasies about doing things like the experts. Since I’ve been in fitness mode for most of the past year, I’ve figured more weight would just make me stronger.

But the experience of hauling real weight (only 40 pounds) up real trails opened my eyes, bigtime.

I’m stuck with my heavy stuff for now but I’ll be thinking light if I start getting crazy ideas about long-haul overnighters.

Share/Save/Bookmark